Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05542
Original file (BC 2013 05542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05542

					COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Palm Harbor, FL to 
San Antonio, TX.

2.  His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from 
Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 8 Aug 83 separation, 
Item 19, Mailing Address after Separation, be changed to San 
Antonio, TX.  


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He has lived in San Antonio, TX since Aug 79.  He has never 
changed his domicile.  He has filed all of his taxes in Texas 
since 1979.  He was discharged in San Antonio, TX and has lived 
there ever since without a break in service.

The Board should find it in the interest of justice to waive 
timeliness because he never knew that being a Texas veteran had 
educational benefits until now.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 9 Aug 79, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular 
Air Force.  The applicant’s DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment – 
Armed Forces of the United States, list’s Palm Harbor, FL as the 
HOR.  

His DD Form 214, Item 6, Place of Entry into Active Duty (POE), 
reflects Miami, FL.  Item 19, Mailing Address after Separation, 
reflects Palm Harbor, FL.  


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
change his mailing address after separation.  The applicant 
failed to provide supporting documentation that the Florida 
address was in error.  

On 14 Nov 78, the applicant enlisted into the Air Force, in 
Miami FL, his POE, and by his signature, verified Palm Harbor 
FL as his HOR.  On 9 Aug 79, the applicant entered active 
service from Miami Florida.  On 8 Aug 83, the applicant was 
discharged from active service.  By signature, the applicant 
validated his future mailing address upon discharge being that 
of his father's in Palm Harbor FL and requested a copy of the 
DD Form 214 be forwarded to the Director of Veteran Affairs 
office in Florida (block 20).  AFI 36-3202 is the governing 
directive for the DD Form 214.  The information for block 19 is 
provided by the applicant prior to the date of separation from 
service.  The sole purpose of the address listed in block 19 
(mailing address after separation) is strictly for the delivery 
of the DD Form 214.  With the applicant already in receipt of 
his DD Form 214, the information in block 19 has no further 
use, is administrative, and unlike HOR or POE, has no impact on 
veteran benefits or entitlements.

The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He does not understand the issue with changing block 19 on the 
DD 214.

At the time of separation he was not sure where his new address 
would be, so he chose his father's address in Florida.

He never went back to Florida and remained in Texas.  The 
recommendation from DPSOR may have not taken into consideration 
that it does make a difference and has an impact on his benefits 
and entitlements especially under the Texas Hazelwood Act. A 
Texas HOR is required on the DD Form 214 to meet the eligibility 
criteria.

The applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit F.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  The 
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we do not find 
his assertions sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale 
provided by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility.  
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the 
Air Force OPRs and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis 
for our decision the applicant has failed to sustain his burden 
that he has suffered either an error or injustice.  In the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

4.  The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-05542 in Executive Session on 9 Oct 14 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Nov 13, w/atch.
	Exhibit B.  Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 13 Jan 14.
Exhibit D.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 20 Feb 14.
Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Mar 14.
Exhibit F.  Letter, Applicant, dated 4 Apr 14, w/atch.











FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
3
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
4
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
4

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00074

    Original file (BC 2014 00074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He requested that his HOR and POE be changed after his last reenlistment on 13 Jan 96 because at that time, he was a legal resident of San Antonio, TX. According to item 7(a) of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his POE at time of entry reflects “Springfield, MA.” According to item 7(b), his HOR at time of entry reflects “Hartford, CT.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002474

    Original file (20140002474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her final DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her Place of Entry Into Active Duty (Place EAD) was San Antonio, TX, not Miami, FL. The applicant states that her initial DD Form 214 shows her Place EAD was Miami, FL, which is correct. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. correcting Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Dix, NJ,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01593

    Original file (BC 2014 01593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01593 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Place of Enlistment (POE) and Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect Desoto, Texas 75115. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019978

    Original file (20120019978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his home of record (HOR) as San Antonio, TX instead of Los Angeles, CA. His DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) shows his HOR as Los Angeles, CA. The evidence of record shows the applicant’s HOR as Los Angeles, CA at the time of enlistment.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03652

    Original file (BC 2013 03652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03652 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as follows: Item 7a, Place of Entry (POE) into Active Duty, be changed from Benton, IL to Laughlin, TX; Item 7b, Home of Record (HOR) at time of Entry, be changed from Benton, IL to Laughlin, TX. The AF Form 475 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007769

    Original file (20100007769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 7b (Home of Record) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her home of record (HOR) as Killeen, TX, instead of Miami, FL. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correction of her records to show her HOR as Killeen, TX.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02600

    Original file (BC 2014 02600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to reflect San Antonio, Texas (TX). The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), volume 1, Appendix A1, part 1, dated 1 Feb 14, states the HOR is the place recorded as the individual’s home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019095

    Original file (20110019095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her home of record (HOR) as "San Antonio, TX." a. Paragraph 2-4h(7) states that Item 7a of the DD Form 214 documents the city, state, and zip code where the Soldier entered active duty, and Item 7b documents the Soldier's HOR.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04225

    Original file (BC-2012-04225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04225 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 6, Place of Entry (POE) onto Active Duty, should read San Antonio, Texas, rather than Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Nevertheless, the Board would like to point-out that should...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023154

    Original file (20100023154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100023154 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a San Antonio, TX address in Block 7b (Home of Record (HOR) at Time of Entry). In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in...